Noncooperative Coalitional Bargaining with Partition-Based Selection of Proposers∗
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper presents a noncooperative dynamic n-player coalitional bargaining game with transferable utilities, which includes Chatterjee et al.’s (1993) fixed-order-proposer model and Okada’s (1996) random-proposer model as two extreme special cases. In this model, proposers are selected by protocols based on partitions of player sets. This paper provides conditions for the subgame efficiency, which means that the grand coalition is formed and no delay occurs in every subgame, both with discount factor δ < 1 and in the limit δ → 1. It is shown that for any discount factor δ < 1, the subgame efficiency is more difficultly achieved in a game with finer partitions, and in the limit δ → 1, the fineness of partitions does not matter for the subgame efficiency.
منابع مشابه
Noncooperative Coalitional Bargaining with Generalized Selection of Proposers∗
This paper presents a noncooperative coalitional bargaining model with generalized selection of proposers, which includes Chatterjee et al.’s (1993) fixed-order-proposer model and Okada’s (1996) random-proposer model as two extreme special cases. In the model, at each round, proposers are selected according to recognition probabilities, which depend on who rejects a proposal at the previous rou...
متن کاملCoalitional Bargaining with Markovian Proposers
The paper generalizes coalitional bargaining of the Baron-Ferejohn type (Eraslan and McLennan, 2006) to non-independent proposers. Widening the scope of possible proposer dynamics significantly, this allows for likely continued offers, alternating offers (Calvó-Armengol, 2001b), and deterministic dynamics such as clockwise rotation of proposers (Herrero, 1985). Existence of stationary subgame p...
متن کاملUniqueness of stationary equilibrium payoffs in coalitional bargaining
We study a model of sequential bargaining in which, in each period before an agreement is reached, a proposer is randomly selected, the proposer suggests a division of a pie of size one, each other agent either approves or rejects the proposal, and the proposal is implemented if the set of approving agents is a winning coalition for the proposer. We show that stationary equilibrium outcomes of ...
متن کاملCoalitional bargaining games with random proposers: Theory and application
We consider a non-cooperative coalitional bargaining game with random proposers to bridge a gap between non-cooperative game theory and cooperative game theory. Theoretical results include the existence of a stationary subgame perfect equilibrium (SSPE) and the characterization of the grand-coalition SSPE as a generalized Nash bargaining solution, provided that it lies in the core. We also prov...
متن کاملBargaining, Values and Implementation with Coalitional Externalities
The paper starts by proposing an explicit and intuitive bargaining process to analyze coalitional externalities, which we then use to generate a value allocation extending the Shapley value to partition function from games, the Rational Belief Shapley value (RBS). We investigate the strategic foundation of the value by constructing a mechanism implementing it. It extends existing models of mult...
متن کامل